RAR and ZIP. Here's a detailed comparison to help you decide

For archiving files around 5GB, the best choice between RAR and ZIP depends on your priorities (compression efficiency, compatibility, speed, etc). Here's a detailed comparison to help you decide:

✅ 1. Compression Efficiency

• RAR: Better compression (smaller file size)
• ZIP: Slightly larger files than RAR

🔹 Winner: RAR, if you want smaller files

✅ 2. Speed

• ZIP: Faster to compress and extract (especially with built-in tools)
• RAR: Slower, especially at high compression levels

🔹 Winner: ZIP, if you want speed

✅ 3. Compatibility

• ZIP: Universal support (Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS)
• RAR: Requires special tools like WinRAR, 7-Zip

🔹 Winner: ZIP, if you need maximum compatibility

✅ 4. Error Recovery

• RAR: Supports recovery records (can repair damaged archives)
• ZIP: No built-in recovery

🔹 Winner: RAR, if you want error recovery

✅ 5. Splitting Files

Both support splitting into volumes (e.g., 1GB chunks), but:

• RAR: Native and easier to manage multi-part archives
• ZIP: Possible but less efficient and less common

🔹 Winner: RAR, if you want to split large files

✅ 6. Security

• Both support password protection and AES encryption.
• RAR supports slightly stronger encryption settings by default.

🔹 Winner: RAR, slightly better for security

🔚 Recommendation

💡 Summary:

If you're archiving for backup and storage, use RAR.

If you're sharing files with many users across different systems, use ZIP.